MizSuz
Posts: 1416
Joined: 1/1/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: dally in this girl's humble opinion if a Master is inlove with me and if i satisfy and complete him he won't need a second slave. Just like i would never feel the need to serve a second Master...it is the same thing. dally, I've heard this before and suppose for some it is as you say. A lot of different factors come in to play, though. To give you an example: I'm a sadist. I've been told by some that my tastes tend to run to the 'edge' although I'll admit that 'edge play' is subject to interpretation and perspective. I'm of the opinion, however, that a masochist or submissive or slave who wishes to satisfy ALL my sadistic tendencies has a death wish and perhaps they just don't know it. It's unreasonable to expect that one body can endure everything one sadist has to dish out, physiologically speaking. Another example: Have you ever worked for one person who was quite capable of keeping 10 people busy enough to consume 10 hour days? Imagine if that was all given to one person because the person thought "If I were good enough I could meet all their needs." You'd go crazy from exhaustion and feelings of inadequacy in short order. There are many dominants who have the skills (and the work) to keep a 'stable' busy. (I really don't like that term, but hope that it conveys my meaning.) There are an infinite number of reasons why having only one slave/sub/bottom could be a problem for a dominant, and I haven't even discussed emotional wants and needs, sexual preferences and orientations, and personal ethics. Being a dominant woman who will NOT promise monogamy (whether I choose to practice it or not) but who requires monogamy (or even chastity) from an owned slave, I can understand the desire to be the 'only one' in a person's life. I think it's ok to ask for what you want, in fact to insist on it in a relationship. It's important, however, for the submissive to look at their reasons and determine whether they are submitting to the dominant or submitting to their own fantasy of submission. I'm not saying that one is better than the other, I'm saying that without a clear understanding of your motivations it's possible (or probable) to end up in damaging relationships. Aside from my personal belief that it is not a submissive's place to dictate sexual freedoms to a dominant, I whole heartedly agree that understanding YOURSELF so that you can clearly communicate your bottom line (whether you are dominant or submissive) is essential in finding a good match. I think, however, that it's important for someone to not only know what they want, but also to know why they want it. Endeavoring to understand these things about ourself will inevitably lead to better relationships, less drama and clearer understandings of where our commitments and boundaries lay in our kink.
_____________________________
Suz In honor of the impending ski season: If you're not livin' on the edge you're takin' up too much space!
|