RE: liars, wannabes, cheating spouses, money hunters, t... - 4/20/2004 5:42:03 PM
|
|
|
inyouagain
Posts: 427
Joined: 1/6/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: EStrict (snipped) I don't agree with a lot of what Inyou says or does, but I don't think I have ever been as rude towards him as you have been. You can disagree without personal name calling. Just because he does it doesn't mean you have to do the same. Opinions are a part of being human, as I mentioned in my now famous *troll accusation* post. Taking an "If" question as an accusation is indicative of the reader having an axe to grind. Keying off on a hypothetical is is an inward problem, sorry, and posing a hypothetical is not calling people names. When I ask a question, or pose an "If this is true" hypothetical qualifier, I am asking the reader to think about the qualifier. As is often the case here, broad minded lifestyle board members become extremely narrow minded and seem to have difficulties with comprehension, and many tend to quickly "jump" to form their opinion. Call me a *troll accuser* if that butters your bread the way you like it, it means little to me. I know what my intent was, and in reading my post it should be quite obvious to most. I am not surprised at the reaction stormi demonstrated (I didn't do it, you did it), as it tends to confirm the "If" qualifier I presented. The fury in her reaction was rather compelling as opposed to acknowledging the "If" qualifier did not apply... despite the unusual appearance of the original "rant post" (ie. 'searching for' description, e-mails, poor ole LSF Blues, etc), as opposed to simply the nature of the "rant" (ie. LSF Blues). At any rate, I covered quite a lot of other points in my now famous *troll accusation* post, including the issue of appreciation that was not apparent anywhere in the "rant post". I believe there was a subsequent comment about caring so much for X number of Domme's and X number of Dom's who had the LSF Blues bigtime, which was offered to strengthen the original "rant post". Regarding the subject of repect being tossed around this thread... (generic you) In any organized avtivity, there are those above and below. Typically in an organized activity there are levels of repect which are simply formalities, or protocol as in a regime, that apply to all members of said regime. An example of a regimented organization is the military, officers out rank enlisted members, and any enlisted military member shows regimental respect to any officer... it's regime protocol, whether you like, love, enjoy, or hate the officer... the path you chose in not being the officer yourself is what places you in the protocol position of showing military respect to officers appointed over you... regardless of gender, race, height, width, or other petty little biases you possess within. The BDSM lifestyle is a plethora of various regimes, with many common nucleus' points of structure, and regime. There being no single document, or manual for all BDSM lifestylers to follow, the waters become muddied quickly, expecially regarding regime protocol. With this "melting pot" brewing, the BDSM lifestyle will ultimately involve many different types of opinion and preference. It also seems that lines which are clear to some are fuzzy to others. Are the majority of "fuzzy liners" on the Dom, or sub side of the dynamic? Based on the majority of posts and resplys seen across the board, most broad BDSM regime minded readers seem to revert to narrow "my opinion" minded types who push their personal concepts... I give respect to those who've earned it from me (by patronization, pleasing, whatever?). Respect is measured by the individual displaying it. If they want to wear a soldiers uniform, or rank (be a lifestyler), but not be a soldier in a regime... it makes it look more like playing than being a soldier (lifestyler). Many board members seem to have a philosophy of "If you are a Captain I like, I will salute you Sir/Maam... but if I don't like you Sir/Maam... fuck you!" IMHO, I feel this mindset to be very unobjective, highly judgemental, totally self-centered, and indicative of a player... versus a genuine and sincere BDSM lifestyler. quote:
I didn't see your original post as *trolling*, but I do still believe you missed my original point. (snipped) You mean a point got missed? Imagine that! Inyouagain
_____________________________
Careful with that axe, Eugene
|
|
|