LadiesBladewing
Posts: 518
Joined: 8/31/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: softvelvet no that is not normal practice, in fact the behavior that you described is of a player... a poly relationship is one of caring, and making each one feel special.. it is what makes a family That being said, there will be times in a poly family (especially one in which servants are kept) in which one member of the household will be "left out" for a while. It is unrealistic to expect -anyone- to get attention all the time, and sometimes one person will get attention and someone else will not -- that is just part of living in a dynamic larger than two, where the only person there -is- to share attention with is the other person. If one person is -consistently- ignored (every day, all of the time) and that isn't what xhe signed on for, then xhe might want to consider why xhe is even there... however, it is NOT abnormal for social events and playtimes to be focused on one person and not another at times, and learning to deal with this is part of learning to deal with living in a very active, very social poly household. As an example, Friday is my mate's birthday. A special friend of hers is coming around to "wine and dine" her for her birthday. He does it every year, and while he and I are -quite- close, it became apparent several years ago that he preferred to have the evening to focus absolutely and completely on SR. So the rest of the family goes to do their own thing. I use this time as "retreat" time (since it is right around the Solstice), spending the day in meditation, without electronic leashes and in a vow of silence. It's worked out well for all of us. I know SR loves me, and I know ELM cherishes me, too. They don't have to dote on me constantly to prove it. I know it in my heart, and so do they, so there is no rancor. Sometimes they have sex. Yay for them. Just because they do something doesn't mean it will never happen again for -me-... I believe in what we have and how we -are-... and I love that they have one another, and that SR has someone who can romance the socks off of her. I'm a philosopher and a teacher. I'd rather nit-pick than romance, and we're all just fine with that -- but SR likes the occasional honey-dripping, peach-soft romance ELM brings, and I'd be a total butt if I tried to keep her from that because I felt "left out". Trying to "take over" the other person so that they -must- spend attention where someone else sees fit in order to "prove" that they can be "trusted" seems like blackmail to me. Poly is different than a monogamous family. If the differences that are a reality in poly aren't comfortable, then poly is probably a poor choice for that individual, but trying to create monogamy within poly is, in my experience, a recipe for destruction, as is the tendency to hide serial monogamy behind a veil called "polyamory" in the hopes that one can have one's cake and eat it, too. Lady Zephyr
< Message edited by LadiesBladewing -- 12/19/2005 5:21:47 PM >
_____________________________
"Should have", "could have", "would have" and "can't" may be the most dangerous phrases in the English language.
|