pollux
Posts: 232
Joined: 7/26/2005 Status: offline
|
AAkasha: Thanks for the long & thoughtful post. I don't really disagree with anything you've said, so I'm left to wonder if I've been clear in communicating my thoughts. quote:
ORIGINAL: AAkashsa But do you see a difference between a man who "has a submissive personality" and a man who "has a desire to submit"? There are men who enjoy submission on a certain level, but are not submissive in their daily life, or in their interactions with women. They are not passive, and they are not just looking for a woman to do all the work from a courting, flirting, sexuality standpoint. There is nothing about them that would make you think they are submissive. Of course I see a difference. You're describing what I referred to in my analogy as the difference between a "blueberry" and a "strawberry". quote:
A lot of these men are out in the dating world, getting together with *vanilla* women and bringing out their femdom side. A self confident man with an assertive, self-aware attitude and a great ability to read people tends to find women who may not be "dominant" -- but she's keen on the idea once she gets the drift. He is the type of guy that dates women who are demanding in all areas of their life, are adventurous, have a high appetite for sex and trying new things. I've met a few of these subs, and unlike the usual story you hear of dating woes and inability to ever meet a femdom or any woman for that matter, he has a track record of "getting" women interested in BDSM in his relationships and it takes off for them. And, this is really all they want; they don't want a 24/7 TPE relationship anyway, they want a woman who is their equal, but also is a femdom. When these types of subs go into the BDSM dating pool they don't have as much trouble because their type is in high demand. They tend to be more selective about their femdom partners, also. That's all fine as far as it goes, and I have no doubt this is happening, and that you know some of these guys, but I would assert you're not really describing a male submissive, at least not the sort who's likely to be reading your post. You're describing desirable vanilla men with a kinky side. That said, it's not really a mystery that desirable men tend to get what they want, and that desirable women tend to get what *they* want, is it? Re: the rest of your post, would it be wrong to say that you dominate vanilla guys because you like to, but dominate self-ID'd subs because you have to?
|