FirmFare
Posts: 48
Joined: 6/21/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: mnottertail Prager appears to be a right-handed prick........... I am a sinistra, but that is relative.......... this is straw man to the last degree........ they are the left (anything that idiots don't agree with) they are the right (those with the mainstream and wonderful values) fuck that gladhand asswipe So the point of this is exactly what the point of all of it is. Left/Right is not a division less than God/Devil Reality is not that simple. While it is convenient to to say that if you are not for the dumbass idiology of Bush (note the texture), you must be against it, or as they have said in time immemorial you are for us or against us....... There exist other realms than holy wars. Rambling? No. I'm still trying to figure out how to operate this feature, bear with me. I referred to Mr. Prager specifically for his ability to clearly state defined act and consequence. Guess he strikes a tender nerve with you. Yes he is right/conservative, this does not automatically mean idiot as you suggest. I don't believe you have a point but an agenda to shoot down any conservative voice. The only thing I get out of your post is name calling and blind criticism. If you have a refutation of my overall point, I'd like to read it. Otherwise start a new thread and I'll be happy to discuss Right/Left idiologies and their consequences there. The discussion here is centered around Acts of God. Since Dennis deals with these issues consistantly, I thought I'd offer his articles for perusing to add insight to the subject matter here. Faith, attributes of God, and our perception of His acts in the light of information from the different faith systems and writings as well as what we can observe of Him. The division you speak of (Left/Right less than God/devil) is true enough I guess. But not a point worth our time. The division is. We can overcome it if we want to. That won't be accomplished with namecalling and invalidating the discussion by dismissing the author as idealogue. You are more an idealogue than he. He at least represents his ideas with thought out conclusions. The point I made is our behavior with our Creator has immediate and eternal consequences. Those consequences are societal as well as personal. As a man, tribe, nation, and as a geneological line. We are born in sin, the sin of our fathers are visited on the family line to the third and fourth generation. The punishment falls on the child of a sinner not because God wants to hurt innocent children but because we, in our freedom to choose, (free will) chose to do what is wrong and bad for us. That wrong hurts the sinner, his family, his tribe, and his nation. Eventually, God must deal with us in terrible wrath to forstall our self destruction. The wrath is held as long as possible to give the sinner the chance to change his behavior patterns. God hopes. He knows all from the beginning to the end, but He waits as long as He can to give as many as possible that opportunity. Then the wrath falls on us all. Children will learn the behavior patterns of the parents and on and on until there is no hope left. So children suffer with the rest of us. The rain falls on the evil and the righteous. This means we receive His blessing and/or curses as a society. My fervent hope for you is peace, not as the world knows peace, but the peace that comes with knowing you are ok with your Maker. This peace remains no matter what goes on in the world. You cannot be shaken from this peace when you know you will be in His favor in the end.
< Message edited by FirmFare -- 9/21/2005 12:20:53 AM >
|