Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
As the Collar Turns:
Collarchat.com - BDSM Forum

Home  Login  Event Calendars  Search 
Espanol  Deutsch  Francais  Italiano  Portugues 

RE: Chloroform anyone?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Health and Safety >> RE: Chloroform anyone? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Chloroform anyone? - 6/3/2005 12:35:13 PM   
EmeraldSlave2


Posts: 3610
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: dark~angel
Any drug during a scene is extremely dangerous. Alcholol is a extremely dangerous during a scene.

It upts the risk, but I believe responsible adults can use substances responsibly and know how to guage things they can and can't do. After all, it wouldn't be the top who is drugged here.
quote:


Anything that takes away the ability to use a safe word is extremely dangerous.

Only pertinent if you use a safe word to begin with.

quote:


Hypnotism is a really good alternative if you are really into trying something that induces an altered state of mind - but remember you are messing with a persons mind and it can cause sezures if done incorrectly also. (Personally, I still wouldn't recommend)

Peace and Love[/center][/font][/size]

I've researched and played with hypnosis since I was 16, and I've never heard of anyone going into a SEIZURE from it. In hypnosis, if something occurs that TRULY disturbs and upsets you, your mind will wake itself up as a protective measure. No serious trauma.

(in reply to darkangel)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Chloroform anyone? - 6/3/2005 3:08:16 PM   
darkangel


Posts: 2339
Status: offline
It can happen if done incorrectly(seizures) - I haven't met anyone but have read instances and watched a report on it. Again I stress that it was done by people who were not practised in it in the first place - a person whom practise it regularly would know the possiblities I would expect. Just passing on what I have seen reported.

I have known people however who have had bad experiences with hypnotism. Again, just personal experience, not everyone is the same. To say it never happens is just as bad as saying it always will. It happens, know the risk, accept it or don't - that way the responsibility is in your court.

As with everything - risk is part of everything - be it alcholol, or whatever - even walking down the street can be dodgy! Personally, I wouldn't scene with someone consuming anything that might effect without realising ie drugs/alcohol and the risk is there - lol, mind you I won't drive after taking a mouthful of wine either, thats just me.

Peace and Love


< Message edited by dark~angel -- 6/3/2005 3:09:03 PM >


_____________________________

Blessings

~Angel~


a belle fille violente
Do not scorn, or frown because I walk a different path to you...

(in reply to EmeraldSlave2)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Chloroform anyone? - 6/7/2005 1:01:13 AM   
shadowmater


Posts: 1
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline
I would like to say two things. First even though I too wish chloroform would make for very interesting play it is not safe. But I would also like to say the hypnotism doesn't exactly work the way someone had previously mentioned but something like that does. Hypnotism is also called the power of suggestion that is because what it is really doing is just playing on the automatic tendencies we have and suggesting while in that state. The power of suggestion is powerful if she did not know it wasn't chloroform she may experience the same effects. My advice (it has worked well for me) a little while before the knockout slip a light sleeping pill in her drink (or get her a little tipsy on alcohol but not both, that warning message is for a reason) she will then be more relaxed and open to the idea, then use a little liquid from an unmarked bottle on a cloth and enact the act just like in the movies. I have filled the bottle with rubbing alcohol and a tiny bit of ammonia it makes for a convincing smell to anyone who has not actually smelled chloroform. Even though she may not actually pass out the expectation of that will make her feel like she should and therefore she probably will (if not just to play along but soon she will forget she is playing along). It will probably be far more realistic than it seems. I’m sorry if this is hard to read but I do not have time to look over my sentences right now.

(in reply to darkangel)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Chloroform anyone? - 6/7/2005 6:54:03 AM   
EmeraldSlave2


Posts: 3610
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
On a tangent with knockout play, mind fucks are tenuous things, the trick is to never give too much information. Many a good mind fuck is ruined because the top tries to over elaborate and ends up making gaping holes in the scene.

Know your partner, if your partner not only likes knock out scenes, but has done a lot of research on them, don't tell them you've put something in their drink when they know that substance has a distinct look and smell. Right off you've given too much information and the person can't get into the headspace that you want. Keep it simple- the idea is to always leave them on that edge of unknowing "Surely he wouldn't do anything that serious...would he?"

(in reply to shadowmater)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Chloroform anyone? - 6/7/2005 3:11:21 PM   
MzBerlin


Posts: 378
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline
I'd have to agree with Shadowmaster, here, on the safer alternatives to chloroform. I think that it would be fun to be drugged with a sleeping pill or some alcohol. (I'm not a big drinker, but I could be coerced...)
I know that not everyone feels that it's OK to play under the influence of alcohol or drugs, I think -depending on the connection and the activities- that a few drinks are OK. Not very PC, but it works for me.
I've never seen a thread on mind-alterning drugs and BDSM. Perhaps I've missed it, but I think that it would be an interesting topic. Is it too controversial to address?
B

_____________________________

new pictures!! www.ropexpert.com
also- you can catch me on www.ksexradio.com every tuesday. I co-host Baadmasters' Dungeon!!

(in reply to shadowmater)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Chloroform anyone? - 6/7/2005 4:07:01 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 1886
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
as an aside, if one doesn't get too carried away, acetone (nail polish remover) wouldn't be too bad for a quick sniff in a rag in place of chloroform......on the other hand if you soak the rag and you the dominating partner are about ready to pass out.....well.....

But I know there are some medicos on this site........what are the risks in that in the general pop? Assuming there is a little polish and poise, I mean.

Ron

_____________________________

"Schlau, aber nichts wahr" Albert Einstein

(in reply to MzBerlin)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Chloroform anyone? - 6/7/2005 8:33:39 PM   
stef


Posts: 1603
Joined: 1/26/2004
From: Boston, MA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

as an aside, if one doesn't get too carried away, acetone (nail polish remover) wouldn't be too bad for a quick sniff in a rag in place of chloroform......on the other hand if you soak the rag and you the dominating partner are about ready to pass out.....well.....

I wouldn't want to inhale acetone that directly.

The MSDS for acetone states the following:

Inhalation:
Inhalation of vapors irritates the respiratory tract. May cause coughing, dizziness, dullness, and headache. Higher concentrations can produce central nervous system depression, narcosis, and unconsciousness.


None for me thanks, I'm driving.

~stef

_____________________________

Some people are like Slinkies. They have no practical use whatsoever, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Chloroform anyone? - 6/8/2005 10:47:04 AM   
foreverfrost


Posts: 13
Joined: 6/1/2005
Status: offline
Chloroform can also cause death in someone alergic to it. Be careful when toying with this stuff.

_____________________________

Fear comes with the possibility of death. Peace comes with it's certainty

(in reply to EmeraldSlave2)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Chloroform anyone? - 7/6/2005 6:37:43 PM   
redpetals


Posts: 7
Joined: 6/27/2005
Status: offline
okay..i'm just going to go out on a limb here and say don't use cloroform.Two reasons ,first there is no way to know what is too much for anyone,and then there is the high probability of loosing the entire contents of your stomach violently,awake or not and gagged or not..

(in reply to EmeraldSlave2)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Chloroform anyone? - 7/6/2005 10:09:14 PM   
Senko


Posts: 27
Joined: 6/26/2004
Status: offline
Ok, simple answer NO!!! we do not want to permanently harm our toys, and yes a sub/slave is a toy ;) BUT I dont think anyone has mentioned this as an alternative, While it does border Breath play. Just like it is taught in martial arts, a proper headlock or holding of ones neck with the crook of your arm as not to block the passage of air but to slow the blood flow to the brain enough to cause unconsiousness, could be a viable option. now while the unconciousness itself will only last 30 seconds to a few minutes, It will have the desired effect if the person has been moved and restrained. Just an idea. BUT WARNING! this should only be done if a HIGH level of trust is in the relationship. IT CAN BE FATAL if done for an extended period of time. DISCLAIMER!!! (yeah I know LOL) So be careful, Take the time to learn the proper technique from an experienced professional. this method also has other yummy side effects, which include massive tingling in the body, lightheaded ness, euphoria, dissorientation, etc.

Hope this has helped.

(in reply to redpetals)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Chloroform anyone? - 7/7/2005 8:01:00 PM   
boynicholas


Posts: 27
Joined: 4/26/2005
Status: offline
Actually, hypnosis is very occasionally used as a diagnostic aide when one is trying to distinguish true epileptic seizures from psychogenic seizures. (Which btw, doesn't necessarily imply intent to 'fake a seizure.' Psychogenic seizures can have a complex underlying psycho-pathology.) However, while hypnosis and hypnotic suggestion can and do precipitate psychogenic seizures, they will not cause a seizure in someone who has true epileptic seizures. (Though to complicate matters, there are some epileptics who have true seizures and pseudoseizures.)

So you certainly may hear about someone who had a seizure caused by hypnosis, but if that were the case, I'd lay dollars to donuts it was a psychogenic seizure. And by virtue of the fact that it sometimes takes provocative diagnostic hocus-pocus like this on the part of neurologists to determine whether a seizure is a true epileptic fit, you can safely assume that they can be pretty convincing.

With regard to chloroform, you have got to be kidding, right? Sorry, but that's nutso. I am all for RACK, but there are a lot better ways to do it. First off, chloroform can and does cause ventricular fibrillation. Second, even in the hands of (admittedly historical) anesthesiologists it caused death of the patient in about 1/4000 uses.

I wouldn't use that on my cat.

Now, if you want to do some sort of 'sedate and rape' kinda thing, the first thing you have to know is this is not without risk... you can cause serious injury and death with almost any drug. But, if done with a little precaution, it is probably safer than a lot of sexual activities that people partake in. And if you are going to do it anyway, I am all about harm reduction – making sure people do what they may choose in the safest way possible.

So, step one: get American Heart Association CPR certified. Not because CPR saves lives (much)... but because in this instance, artificial respiration (mouth to mouth) actually might. The biggest cause of death in cases of over sedation is respiratory arrest. Breathing is a mechanical function that can be temporarily performed by someone else for you. If you don't know how to do AR and you do this stuff, you are a total nutball who should not be trusted with string, much less a person's health and welfare.

Step two: have a back-up plan. Say your little submissive does get into trouble, what are you going to do? Where is the phone? Are you 10 miles in the back-woods? Are you going to have to choose between staying with your partner or finding the cell? Gee... poor planning there dumbass. So don't be a dumbass.

Step three: have a young healthy partner who has never had any problems with anesthesia or sedation (if they've had 'em before.) No chronic medical problems. Nuff said. Sorry if you are diabetic or asthmatic. No fun for you. (On that same note, that includes people who meet the medical definition of obese. Chunky is OK, big thick necked person who has a BMI of 30+... nope. Wouldn't do it.)

Step four: have a submissive who has not eaten anything solid in 6 hours, liquid in 2. Not only do most sedative agents cause respiratory depression, they make ya puke too. And having sucked chili and corn-dogs outta someone's trachea, I can tell you, you really don't want a full stomach at these times.

Step five: be sober and clear headed yourself. Would you drive a car while drinking? No? Why not? Might not be 100% in control of yourself and hurt someone... same here.

Step six: Start low and go slow. I do the same thing when I sedate someone to put their shoulder back in place. I start with a low dose of a medicine and see what happens. I can always add more, but sucking it out after its in 'em is not where you want to be. So if someone is naive with a medicine, start with a low end dose and see what happens.

Now for medicines to pick... depends on what you want...

Amnestic? (Not remembering the event, but probably awake during.) Try a benzodiazepine, like valium or ativan. Ativan is the shortest acting of the common oral ones. Its a controlled substance though, so you can only get it through a licensed practitioner. If you got a kinky doc you know, try them.

Cheap easy and legal? Try alcohol. You can add benadryl 50 mg if you want a little more sedation. Though I would not go with high volume (like beer or wine) by mouth as you will likely get puking. If you want it to go in fast, enemas do it well, but this is sometimes too effective and causes too much or too rapid uptake. So if you want to go in the rectum, try first with the equivalent of 2 glasses of wine and see how that much effects your submissive before you try anything else.

I would avoid the opoids, (percocet, vicodin, mepergan etc) because for the amount of sedation you get, you get a whole lotta respiratory depression.

Chloral Hydrate is actually pretty safe by mouth or per rectum, but again, you have to have a kinky prescribing provider (as this, like the benzos is schedule IV.) If you mix CH with alcohol (I don't advise this, kids!) it is actually the proverbial 'Mickey Finn.'

Another more relatively easy and available sedative is phenergan. Not scheduled, pretty safe, and some people get dramatic sedation (and even amnesia) with phenergan.

If you find a source for GHB.... don't take it. It can be profoundly and deadly oversedating.

And lastly, I am a doctor, but I am also some yutz you read posting on some internet forum.... think about it. Know what you are doing first, find a sympathetic kink-aware doctor who will talk with you about it. Besides, if nothing else, with the exception of the benadryl and booze, you can't get those without a providers rx.

Nick

(in reply to Senko)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Chloroform anyone? - 7/13/2005 3:47:24 PM   
anopheles


Posts: 240
Joined: 6/23/2005
Status: offline
Besides the obvious and documented dangers of chloroform outlined in this thread. If you drug someone, even if they 'consented' to being drugged, from the moment that the are no longer able to give consent, or voice nonconsent, performing any sexual acts on them would be considered sexual assault in just about every jurisdiction. What if you drugged them, they woke up, realized they didn't like the experience and told some one.

That's playing with fire. Serious fire.

(in reply to boynicholas)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Chloroform anyone? - 7/13/2005 4:14:37 PM   
EmeraldSlave2


Posts: 3610
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: anopheles
What if you drugged them, they woke up, realized they didn't like the experience and told some one.

That's playing with fire. Serious fire.

Yup.

Grin.

Thanks for the very thorough and common sense reply Nicholas!!

(in reply to anopheles)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Chloroform anyone? - 7/13/2005 11:11:52 PM   
hardxdrive


Posts: 119
Joined: 7/12/2005
Status: offline
i have alot of exp with it if anyone wants to talk just email my profile. I never had a problem.

(in reply to MdBiM41)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Chloroform anyone? - 7/13/2005 11:32:53 PM   
hardxdrive


Posts: 119
Joined: 7/12/2005
Status: offline
I have exp using chloroform for about 5yrs. My present or my past slave who are into it never had a health problem. This is part of the intoxication fetish. I'm not into drugs. I don't drink or smoke. Just a kink to me. I don't use it anymore. I use two different things that are safer where it lasts only 10mins and recovery time is a few mins. Also part of a take down rape scene. It can be deadly to some people and it can kill in the wrong hands. I'm also not saying the author of this topic is wrong. I have have alot of exp using it and getting it.

(in reply to EmeraldSlave2)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Chloroform anyone? - 7/13/2005 11:59:20 PM   
faithNZ


Posts: 44
Joined: 11/28/2004
From: New Zealand
Status: offline
While i can understand the appeal of the use of chloroform, there is no way on earth that i would want it used on me or anyone around me.
For a start, someone under a general anaesthetic has to have a maintained airway and it has also been associated with ventricular fibrillation (when the ventricles/lower part of the heart fails to pump properly, instead quivering like a bowl of jelly) which needs other drugs, like IV adrenaline and a defibrillator.
Not worth the risk of a potential murder or manslaughter charge.

(in reply to hardxdrive)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Chloroform anyone? - 7/17/2005 10:54:59 PM   
Archer


Posts: 150
Joined: 3/11/2005
Status: offline
OK things that people didn't address here

1. CHLOROFORM IS SUSPECTED BY NTP AND IARC TO BE CARCINOGENIC.

2. Hazardous Decomposition Products:
TOXIC FUMES OF HYDROGEN CHLORIDE GAS, PHOSGENE GAS, CO & CO2

3. IHL-RAT LC50 47 g m-3 / 4h
The last one means that at the concentration listed it killed 50% of the rats exposed in 4 hrs.

Still think you know enough to handle this stuff???

I'm worked with HazMat for years and I wouldn't do it.

(in reply to faithNZ)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Chloroform anyone? - 7/18/2005 8:30:13 AM   
boynicholas


Posts: 27
Joined: 4/26/2005
Status: offline
OK, I certainly agree that using chloroform is not a spectacular idea and that even given t he choice to play in a somewhat more dangerous manner and try to sedate your partner, there are far safer choices.

However, not because it will kill a bunch of lab rats if you drown them in the stuff. For that matter pure oxygen for a prolonged period will kill you, as will tylenol and aspirin if you take too much at a time.

What demonstrates its risk is the results of putting it into practice. About 1/4000 times it caused the death of the patient. That's shitty if you have another safer sedative that causes death in only 1/100,000 times, but that doesn't mean that at the time it was not a miracle cure. For example, say you needed an appendectomy or a C-section. You have a choice of having it done with no anesthesia whatsoever, or you can have chloroform and have a 1/4,000 chance of death.

OK then.

The thing you have to realize with quotes like LC50's or LD50's (Lethal Concentration or Dose at which 50% of exposed organisms die) is that near enough everything has one. There is a LD50 for caffeine for chrissake. (And I think I may have pushed that envelope a few times.)

192mg/kg oral dose, by the way.

With regards to carcinogenesis... yeah, and so is just about everything if given in highe enough doses for a long enough time to rats. However, this is often with chronic exposure. Often substances that can cause cancer if endured chronically only cause significant risk for a single episode in extremely high doses. For example, if you get an X-ray a day for a year, that is real bad. But we can give you twenty in a day if we don't do it that often. Moreover, when they say things like 'suspect' something is a carcinogen, that is often because the evidence, if there, is under impressive.

So while I said, there is much safer stuff with which one can cause sedation (which is why chloroform isn't used today), and this is probably overall a risky practice even in experienced hands with a young and healthy person, with the safest possible drugs.... its not like this is a lurking bogeyman that can't be handled in anything other than a biosafety level 4 lab. Its a drug, and like all drugs it carries risks. But you can bump yourself off quite as readily with caffeine or with aspirin if you are stupid about it... and that's the important thing to recognize.

Nick

(in reply to Archer)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Chloroform anyone? - 7/25/2005 2:26:57 AM   
MisPandora


Posts: 66
Joined: 4/7/2004
From: Philadelphia, PA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: dark~angel

Hypnotism is a really good alternative if you are really into trying something that induces an altered state of mind - but remember you are messing with a persons mind and it can cause sezures if done incorrectly also.



A person cannot be forced into doing anything with Hypnosis, especially not something that they'd not already be willing to do in one's aware state of mind. "Incorrectly done" hypnosis is simply that which someone does not go under, and that surely would not cause sz to occur.


_____________________________

Pandora
Ms World Leather 2004
Ms Philadelphia Leather 2004
http://www.msworldleather2004.com

(in reply to darkangel)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Chloroform anyone? - 12/19/2005 2:18:19 PM   
MasterHyde


Posts: 67
Joined: 4/10/2004
From: Philadelphia, PA
Status: offline
quote:

Anything that takes away the ability to use a safe word is extremely dangerous.


Hello. My name is "extremely dangerous." LOL

Safewords aren't necessarily a bad thing.
In some situations, they're extremely useful.
But many people can and do play safely without them.


_____________________________

Master Hyde
The self-righteous, poly, dominant, possessive control freak with strong paternal tendencies and a sadistic inner child

(in reply to darkangel)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Health and Safety >> RE: Chloroform anyone? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Collarchat.com is a member of the Free Speech Coalition
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.104