cmatrix4761
Posts: 35
Joined: 6/28/2005 Status: offline
|
I think that the control preference of an individual who is engaged in the BDSM lifestyle is a reflection of their 'other life', so to speak. I've discovered, through interaction with the BDSM communities, that it is often an inversion of the role played in their normal lives. CEOs seem to prefer to be tied up, often because of their constant control at their careers, while women often like to dominate who consider themselves surrounded by a chauvinism elsewhere. I believe it's a retreat to something purer but opposite, perhaps a mechanism of balance to one's psyche. A switch would [logically, under the said pretense] be an individual who fosters multiple roles in his/her (though most switches seem to be male) daily life. I switch, myself, and I have to play aggressive and placid in my roles in life (being both a business man and a programmer); I feel it is a reflection of the life I live -- when I have to be horribly aggressive (for instance, when I have to make it a point to have clients and administration fix issues they don't want to fix) then I tend to feel more submissive at home; whereas, when I'm more submissive (for instance, when I have to be the scapegoat for problems and get asschewings), I feel more dominant at home. I submit, then, that the control preference at home (in this case, during engagement of BDSM) is a psychological balancing mechanism (or, perhaps, a defense mechanism-- proving to oneself that one's role is not explicitly defined by one's work). Just a thought, -- CM
|