Raphael
Posts: 213
Joined: 5/10/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ShiftedJewel quote:
The article refers to flacid dimensions, not erect. The relationship between the two is extremely variable. It's quite possible he was average or above average flacid, but still much smaller than average erect? I wish......... nope, the two dimensions rarely changed much... we had to find an alternative form of birth control simply because they just didn't make condoms that small. Jewel I don't know if you're trying to be funny or not, so I'll assume not for the moment. The average penis is MUCH larger erect than it is flacid, so it sounds like exactly what I suggested - he was average or better flacid, but well below average erect. You know, there is a serious side to this fairly comical subject. All that ridiculous neurotic nonsense I see in women constantly about their looks (usually revolving down to a feeling there is something wrong with her if she can't approximate an adolescent boy in build) does have a male counterpart in penis size. Men are really quite neurotic about it in general, I think. I know I have been at times - and best I can tell I'm a good deal above average... but not being gay or bi, about the only time I see an erect penis that isn't my own is watching a porno film, so most of my life I've thought I was rather inferior in that department. I can only imagine what it might be like for a man like you describe... and I can finally really feel compassion instead of just exasperation for all the women that look damn good to me but are completely convinced they're hideously overweight.
|