Voltare
Posts: 467
Joined: 1/1/2004 From: Santiago, Chile Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: dommeTulsa Darn, here goes my foot into my mouth again!! To be pretty and well dressed cost a lot of money compared to the 3 S's most men do.. shit, shower and shave.. put on old blue jeans and he is ready to go. I have no common inteerest with someone who has not a penny to spoil me with. Receiving gifts and demanding sub/slave to part with his money is a rush for me. But as the married guy, whose wife won't play (and lives in the nice house with the nice car and food in the frig) said the other day" I think $$$ changes the perspective of bdsm and it is not something I am interested in" Now you are telling me I should be self-sufficient, spend the hours per week to maintain my looks, spend the time online to find a decent guy and not expect to be rewarded for all that effort!!?? I don't think so... To me it is no different than the vanilla guy who thinks buying dinner entitles him to "a roll in the hay" Wake up guys.. how many desirable dommes do you know who are agreeable to paying their own way so you can play for free?? Ok, get the slamming started... just my opinion but who am I but a novice naturally dominate female?? But please be on your knees when you slam me, it is the least you can do!! And they say romance is dead. To me, Money does NOT equal love. If your only interest is mutual BDSM interaction, i.e. play partners, perhaps replacing the BDSM activity with something vanilla would put things in perspective. I expect on a hiking trip (instead of a scene) with a friend (instead of a masochist) that she would probably bring her own tent and sleeping bag (instead of her own fetish clothing and makeup.) I would expect to bring some of the supplies, food, etc (ropes, dungeon equipment, etc) but she should bring the things she needs as well. Just because I am more experienced as a hiker, doesn't mean she shouldn't have her own shoes (unless perhaps this is the first time and I'm showing her the ropes.) If the relationship is D/s in nature, romantic, etc... then money should NOT be a factor initially. I know there are lots of people who marry for money, marry for power, position, etc etc - more power to them. I don't see it as healthy, in my myopic view of the world. If a woman is simply a means of an end for me - then she ceases to be a woman, and starts being the piggybank. About six months ago, there was a huge disagreement between myself and a (cough) pro 'submissive' on this site, because of our strong mutual disagreement on those issues. My position hasn't changed - if money is part of the equation, then leave it as a business arrangment. Pretending it's something else is irresponsible and reprehensible. Stephan
_____________________________
[GEEK] Me [/GEEK] "There is always some madness in love, but there is also always some reason in madness" - Nietzsche [image]http://img2.exs.cx/img2/7251/voltare-death.gif[/image]
|