ProtagonistLily
Posts: 1002
Joined: 12/27/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
Again, and for the twentieth time, I don't care what people call themselves behind closed doors. What I would love to see happen is a dissapearance of the "submissive vs slave" questions posed by the n00b of the week. It won't dissapear by people saying things like "it can only be defined by the people in the relationship." It could dissapear if there was a comprehensive and complete reference work that once and for all defined these terms in clear and objective terms, and that reference work was one of the first things shown to people entering the lifestyle. Taggard But again, you and I, who dig the shit out of each other, can't agree. And neither of us are "players" or 'newbies" or "nutters". So, if you and I can't come to any standardized agreement of what these words me, then how can we expect that others would be able to as well. Think about this Taggart: A Chocolate bar. Think about what it is...and how it could be described. Language is infinate in it's ability to describe. To me, a choclate bar is at best silky, creamy, indulgent, naughty, sinful, sweet, decadent....the expression of what a chocolate bar to me is really endless. Well, what about the guy who doesn't like chocolate. He has at his avail any number of words to discribe what it is TO HIM. I'm sure the dictionary definition of a choclate bar is something like : a molded slab of melted chocolate. But that doesn't begin to describe a chocolate bar for me. Language is so much about internal and external perception. To expect to standardize Slave and Submissive in sort of strips it of all the beauty if you ask me. L
_____________________________
If it's not fun, why bother?
|