Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
As the Collar Turns:
Collarchat.com - BDSM Forum

Home  Login  Event Calendars  Search 
Espanol  Deutsch  Francais  Italiano  Portugues 

RE: Dos and Don´ts


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Dos and Don´ts Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Dos and Don´ts - 7/13/2004 4:00:38 AM   
kiki blue


Posts: 315
Joined: 1/16/2004
From: Brisbane, Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Voltare

1) Don't get involved in long distance relationships.
2) Don't get involved in long distance relationships.


So people whose partners have be away, should ditch them? Not just in the armed forces, but people who travel a lot for business, or have to live away. Long distance isn't the problem - people have been having LD relationships for a lot longer than the internet.

quote:


If they cant afford a web cam, they cant afford to be online. Webcams are inexpensive, and cost less then one months internet access for most people.


I have no intention of owning a webcam - I see no point in having people watch me type. Sure, they may see me laugh or get up and leave the room, but that's about it. With digital cameras being everywhere, it's easy to get a recent photo.

quote:


It has been my experience, that someone who says they cannot afford a webcam, is really saying they dont want to admit they have been less then truthful about their appearence. Almost every other reason stems from some sort of lack of sincerity.


Sounds more like you've been burnt once or twice and are now painting everyone with the same brush. I have as much desire to own a web cam as I do a motorbike, and I have no intention of ever getting on the back of one of those things.

To say that everyone who doesn't have a webcam and refuses to do so is either lying about their appearance, and/or everything else, is a greatly uneducated statement.

quote:


4) Don't lie, and do not tolerate liars.


I agree with you there. I have no reason to hide who I am, if someone doesn't like me as I am, then they're not for me, no harm no foul.

quote:


6) Within the first week, talk on the phone. My own advice is in the first two days. If they do not feel safe giving their phone number out, nothing you can possibly do online will convince them that they will be safe. Period.


I don't give my number out to every Tom Dick and Harry that comes along, I'm not desperately searching for anyone. If I feel a connection with them, then I'll arrange to meet, or point them in the direction of my local group. When I feel the time is right, then I'll talk to them. Saying that someone must talk to the other person in 48 hours comes across like someone's desperate to collar or be collared before their eggs expire.

quote:


7) Do 'google' that phone number, and the persons name. That is, go to a search engine and punch in that information.


This goes into the realm of stalking to me, and goes past what I find acceptable.

quote:


8) Do not take any relationship online too seriously. Love, real love, doesnt happen online. It happens face to face, person to person. Let the internet give you a chance to meet at a coffee house or a resturant, but feelings of 'love' online are 95% fantasy.


This comes across as another flagrantly uneducated statement.

quote:


10) If the goal is to live together, the submissive should be prepared to move. There are a few reasons for this, the major one being that money talks louder then any whip, flogger, or crop. If the Dominant cannot afford to provide for the submissive, there will always be resentment.


Only if the dominant party is lacking self esteem. I disagree that it should be the submissive party to always make the move. Each relationship and situation is different, and it should be the person who is more able to make the move, to do it. If the submissive has a better paying job, and the dominant has issues with that, then they're gonna keep having issues til they pull their head outta their ass.

quote:


Until the couple has been together for several months, finances should remain completely seperate. Nothing can undermine a D/s relationship faster then money trouble!


Nothing can undermind any relationship more than lack of honest communication. Money is just one issue that people don't communicate about. Expectations and boundaries are what should be communicated more, rather than who pays for what.

I also disagree that after only a few months should things turn to joint finances. Why should they move in together straight away? Even if one moves across the country to the other, there is such a thing as "taking it slowly", especially if children are involved.

quote:


If you insist on using the internet to meet people, stick to the personals sites, they really do come through with first meetings. Additionally, when you use a personals site, the expectations of love, romance, etc, are not nearly as fixed as when you have spent six months in a chat room with a person.


Again, it depends on the people involved. I don't think we should totally rule out one form of communication or meeting. How about we rule out bars, pubs and clubs, because people there are only out to fuck?

quote:


13) DO NOT engage in BDSM or D/s play on the first date (or first meeting.) Real intimacy comes after nearly a month together - this is when BDSM or D/s will become meaningful (unless your goal is casual play.)


"Real intimacy" is not something that can be quantified by time. I've had more intimate engagements with people in a few months than they had with others over years. Slot your kink in where it feels comfortable, and talk, talk TALK about it before hand, rather than saying "oh, we've been together for about a month now, things must be getting intimate". Some people prefer to move slower, some faster. There is no hard and fast rule.


No matter how a relationship is started or where you met, it's all about communication. You have to know what you want to get what you want. You have to be able to express yourself, your hopes, dreams, desires, wants and needs. You also need to be able to listen to the other person (or people). You have to be willing to compromise.

When it comes to long distance relationships, it's important to have set times to chat with each other, on the net and on the phone. I find rituals help keep you connected - whether you're yet to meet, or you've known each other for years and see each other regularly and can't live together yet, these things are important.

I think if you meet someone online, and you form a relationship with them (because *gasp* it can happen), then having a goal to meet, when able to, is important. You need to have goals to work towards.

(in reply to Voltare)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Dos and Don´ts - 7/13/2004 11:38:09 PM   
baileythorne


Posts: 264
Joined: 6/6/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kiki blue

"Real intimacy" is not something that can be quantified by time. I've had more intimate engagements with people in a few months than they had with others over years. Slot your kink in where it feels comfortable, and talk, talk TALK about it before hand, rather than saying "oh, we've been together for about a month now, things must be getting intimate". Some people prefer to move slower, some faster. There is no hard and fast rule.


No matter how a relationship is started or where you met, it's all about communication. You have to know what you want to get what you want. You have to be able to express yourself, your hopes, dreams, desires, wants and needs. You also need to be able to listen to the other person (or people). You have to be willing to compromise.

When it comes to long distance relationships, it's important to have set times to chat with each other, on the net and on the phone. I find rituals help keep you connected - whether you're yet to meet, or you've known each other for years and see each other regularly and can't live together yet, these things are important.

I think if you meet someone online, and you form a relationship with them (because *gasp* it can happen), then having a goal to meet, when able to, is important. You need to have goals to work towards.


kiki blue,

Thank you for a well thought out response to all of the points above. There is no "one true way" to manage relationships. Anyone who starts giving me rules gets tuned out.

As far as the quote above, very well put. I seem to be embarking upon a long distance relationship though it's not clear where it is headed (see my sig line). We traded many emails and spent over 20 hours on the phone. We also checked each other out through references. That is a benefit of being part of the larger community.

We played within 6 hours of meeting each other. And I have absolutely no regrets.

--bailey

< Message edited by baileythorne -- 7/13/2004 11:39:06 PM >


_____________________________

Dance like no one's watching and
Love like you've never been hurt.

(in reply to kiki blue)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Dos and Don´ts - 7/14/2004 1:09:25 AM   
Voltare


Posts: 467
Joined: 1/1/2004
From: Santiago, Chile
Status: offline
First off, I'll just point out (as Gloria suggested) that this wasn't intended to be the solutions for everyone, but rather a good safe start for people who do not have experience in online relationships. I've broken, and will probably continue to break my own guidelines in time, because I have the luxury of doing so.

The specific concerns with the most attention, essentially the webcam and the search engine, I still hold fast to. Obviously, they don't work for everyone - but I know that I would have saved myself quite a bit of time and effort had I held to this rule more dearly. For individuals where the equipment is an issue, there are cyber cafe's all over most medium or large sized cities, where you can sit (in public) drink a cup of coffee, and use their computers complete with webcam. The significant investment of two or three dollars erases any doubt that the hundreds or even thousands potentially spent on airfare, hotel rooms, phone bills, not to mention the actual investment of time is being well spent. Obviously, some people will not agree - I don't expect everyone to.

As for Google, again, I'd have saved myself the trouble with the 44 year old had I taken three minutes to type her real name in (which is, in the end, how I learned of the deceit.) When confronted with the information, she admitted that she had never really intended to meet, but she could not bear to end the fantasy. Your milage will, of course, vary depending on distance, age, and amount of time and interest you genuinely have in cyber based relationships.

kiki blue - I'll answer most of your topics point by point.

Rule 1 & 2 - I'm not suggesting current real time relationships should be abandoned. In my mind, once you've met and spent substantial time together (again an arbitrary statement) the relationship is no longer 'internet based' but rather 'real time.' For me, that means having had at least three real time dates or more. Having been in the military, and having had to leave a woman behind, I deeply regret trying to maintain the long distance relationship she and I shared for over a year, as it was nothing but misery and guilt for both of us. Those, of course, are my experiences - I'm not suggesting wives and husbands abandon vows, etc - the choice to be in a long distance relationship is obviously up to the couple. My advice specifically stated "don't -get- involved" i.e. don't start them in the first place. I personally think they're more trouble then their worth. I can say this, because I wrote this piece. Naturally, you are welcome to disagree and we can hopefully agree to leave it at that.

Webcam- already addressed, but if you don't want a webcam, don't buy one. It's just my opinion that most people who refuse to be seen on a webcam usually have something to hide. I don't have any desire to see anyone type - it's seeing them live and speaking with them directly that I am addressing. A video phone works just fine. Recent photos don't cut it for me - I've been burned on 'fake' photos far too many times, and without the ability to speak to the person, on cam, real time, there's no way to authenticate them - with the possible exception of Lawrence and bailey who were able to verify references via third parties, due to their organization relations (a great alternative.) My point isn't that you need this piece of technology - it's that some tangible means of verifying a number of issues, easily, and inexpensively has value. A friend of mine recently had a Dom she had been speaking with for over a year online come to her house for 'real life' M/s... only to be more then a little shocked to find he was in a wheelchair. Webcams are just another tool to make interaction more 'live' and erase some of the 'fantasy' element involved with the net.

6) Phone Numbers - I'm not saying give your home number out to everyone. In fact, I'd suggest the opposite, don't give the number out till you feel ready. If emailing daily for six months and hours of conversation every day in IM isn't enough to make you feel ready to give your phone number out, then perhaps it's wise to admit you're not seeking real life interaction with this individual. There's no shame in that - I know I have a few dozen people I have on my IM list who I chat with occasionally, but would no more give my home phone number out then I would twenty dollar bills.

Again, the context of this posting was aimed specifically at long distance, internet oriented relationships. In fact, I said...

quote:

Most of these are geared towards long distance relationships from online, i.e. more then a few hours drive


I'm not sure what sort of people you would normally meet online, but if I was making arrangements to meet a woman from online, and she said "well, fly to the airport, get a hotel, and on tuesday night maybe I'll catch you at the munch..." I wouldn't have the impression she was all that interested in a meeting in the first place. It's not a matter of desperation, or egg timers - it's a way of sorting through the folks who don't talk on the phone, because they have wives/girlfriends/parents who they are trying to keep secrets from, as well as weeding out the folks who are addicted to the net (or net based relationships) and talk the talk - but dont' know a flogger from a 9 iron.

7) - Google. I've made my case for google already on this thread, and on another thread. Feel free to join that debate if you wish. For me, forewarned is forearmed.

8) - Love online is 95% fantasy. I don't see how my opinion on internet love makes what I've said remotely uneducated. Most of my words are spelled correctly, there's minimal typographical errors, and I've supported most of my statements with reasonable arguements. If the material isn't of value to you, I'm sure you can find something more useful to do with your time.

My opinion's not changed - most 'love' online (usually directly after some form of cybersex, and usually within the first week) is no more then the real time version of lust at first sight. Personally, I think love grows from familiarity, over time (usually several weeks and months.) I don't wish for this to detract from those who feel they have found love quickly - I believe a very high compatibility makes the time it takes to feel love shortened, and if anything the internet provides even greater conversation and discussion of those elements of compatibility (i.e. intellectual levels, music, emotional drives, tastes in television/movies, romantic interests, sexual tastes, etc.) I've fallen in love very fast - in a matter of a couple weeks. At the time, it felt like 'at first sight.'

The inherent problem with 'love' online, is that you aren't seeing the entire picture. You're reading, one pixle at a time, about what the other person wishes to show you. You can imagine them in sexy underware and high heels, or in boxers and wearing fantastic cologne as you like. You can laugh about the things you love, and share wonderful stories. There are no bills unpaid, no dirty socks on the floor, no forgetting to shave. The potential flaws (poor spelling or typing skills aside) amount to being late for an 'internet date', or being away from the keyboard too long. There's really very little that can go wrong with internet relationships, and ultimately the person you talk to creates a picture in your mind of what they wish for you to see. Since most of us cannot see how we really are in the first place, the notion that we present who we really are online is near impossible. It's akin to asking the deaf, dumb, and blind men to tell me what they're dealing with - one says it's a lamp post, the other a rock, the third tapping me on the shoulder a lot. None of them can communicate that it's an elephant. Besides, why waste such a beautiful, powerful emotion on pixles? It belongs in person, on real life dates, on flowers, on walks in the park.

10) - Location. I've already qualified this, but I'll restate that if a move is to take place, that it should be the submissive. Even if this requires the Dominant to acquire a new residence in the same city, or even across the street - trying to introduce a Dominant into a situation where the house is owned by the submissive is just asking for trouble. This is doubly so where children are involved - and sometimes children will flat make any kind of 'move' impossible. Then it becomes a matter of sacrificing what you want for yourself, for the benifit of your children - but this is another topic for another day.

Personals sites vs/chat rooms - I've met people from both forums. I just offered what tends to work more effectively for me. I'd be happy to stack my efforts in private, to illustrate why I think this is the case, but I'd say personals are more effective in terms of time, nearly 10 to one. Nowhere did I suggest one form should be ruled out - just that one form is simply more effective.

13) I made it clear, in the first place, this was intended for newbies. Newbies, really shouldn't be playing with -anyone- the first time they meet them, because there's no base of reference to draw from, and CERTAINLY no way to verify that the person they are playing with isn't actually a serial killer, rapist, or any number of deviants that fall into BDSM. This, to me, is the same as saying don't have sex on the first date. It doesn't mean people will follow my guideline - I know I've done it (both sex, and play on the first date.) I also know that I'm experienced enough to know when the risk is minimal, and when to walk away.

As for the issue of intimacy, again, as a general guideline intimacy blooms best in real time. I'm not saying it can't happen online, I'm saying it tends to be more rewarding (in my opinion) in real time.

Lawrence: Congratulations to you and your girl. I wish you nothing but the best! You both are a great example that this place -can- work, in spite of the frustrations involved.

All others: My bottom line is essentially that the net can be a safe, rewarding place to meet other people, either virtually or physically. It can also make you want to cut your eyes and heart right out of your body and send them down the drain. Whichever you find to your tastes, the key is common sense and a sense of fun. If you're not enjoying your visit to cyberia, then don't feel obligated to stay. If it works, go with it. If it doesn't, find something that does. Don't be afraid to try new things, but don't do anything with your body that you don't think it's designed for. Don't trust it to people who are reckless, and don't be reckless with others. Etc etc etc...

Thank you for flying, please return your seats to an upright position and secure your trays.

Stephan


_____________________________

[GEEK] Me [/GEEK]
"There is always some madness in love, but there is also always some reason in madness" - Nietzsche
[image]http://img2.exs.cx/img2/7251/voltare-death.gif[/image]

(in reply to baileythorne)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Dos and Don´ts - 7/14/2004 5:04:21 AM   
LadyAngelika


Posts: 3240
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Montréal - Canada
Status: offline
Stephan,

Like most who replied, I'm going to thank you for the post and say that overall, I agree with much of what you said.

And then of course, I'll put my own 2¢ in. I've had 3 LDRs, all BDSM related.

(Note that LDR = Long Distance Relationship and F2F = Face 2 Face.)

I agree with points 1 & 2. You’ll see on my profile that I will only meet local people. After 5 years as well, I’ve decided it’s way too hard on me emotionally.

LDR 1 - I dated a man in Philly for 2 years and we saw each other every 8 weeks. We talked on the phone everyday. We even got engaged. But when we have a long distance relationship, we aren’t being put through the same day to day routine but rather have this *relationship time* which can become almost some kind of escapism. But what I realised 2 years into the relationship was that the time we were apart was perhaps more enjoyable then the time we were together and fell into the whole romance of missing him. All the time we were apart, I fantasised about how perfect the relationship could be and then when we got F2F, I could not help but be a wee bit disappointed. I’m not saying that everyone goes through this, I’m simply sharing my experience. I’ve reflected quite a bit on what happened. That was 5 years ago and I’ve learned about managing expectations, and overall, I’ve grown. Points 5 & 8 really apply big time here.

LDR2 - I went into this one more cautiously. This guy and I realised we worked better as friends and casual play partners as we don’t click in for a long-term relationship. I believe for that meeting I was lowering my expectations (and this doesn’t require lowering ones standards) and retained high hopes. It worked well for me though. In terms of gathering info on this person, he was a published author and journalist so I was able to get quite a bit about him and saw quite a few pics but no cam. Didn’t really need it. He was pretty much what I expected physically. I think that we just simply didn’t click. He’s still a good friend to date.

LDR 3 – Here is where, in my own experience, rule #3 totally doesn’t apply. I’m not going to knock this point because it makes a whole lot of sense (though I’d agree a digital camera is just as good). But at the same time, you have to be willing to give people a little leeway and trust. I spent 3 months talking on the phone and only saw 1 picture of a man in NYC. When I flew down to meet him in person, he was *exactly* what I expected him to be in terms of his mannerisms, his body language, etc. I’d obviously learned from my first experience. I totally fell in love and still have lots of love for this person. This person and I are no longer together but he remains perhaps one of my best friends.

In all 3 instances and in the dozen or so local meetings I’ve had, I’ve been told that I come across F2F pretty much like they expected. And that makes me feel good because I realise that I don’t need a Webcam to be real. I just have to be real about myself and honest with myself and others about who I am.

Yeah #4 (being truthful) is a no brainer Stephan and applies to way more then just LDRs. I’ve experienced more of that in F2F relationships then LDRs to be quite honest.

As for #13 (playing on the first date), well I would say use your judgement. I’ve done it a few times with people I felt completely comfortable with and I don’t see how it affected the overall outcome. I would recommend that people however play safe. I would never suggest tying someone up in the first session for example.

I think I’d add another point to this:
#17 - Follow your instincts. They are rarely wrong.

- LA

_____________________________

An iron hand in a velvet glove.

(in reply to Voltare)
Profile   Post #: 24
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Dos and Don´ts Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Collarchat.com is a member of the Free Speech Coalition
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.054