|
dincubus -> RE: Dan Scott vs JR Ewing (3/7/2006 7:01:53 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: FangsNfeet
When growing up, the only TV villian/mischever that I watched was JR Ewing. Watching Dallas was a family thing. We were always shocked at all the schems that JR tried and pulled off. Using people, back stabing, cheating, paying off the law, and hiring militants.
Now, pet likes this show called "One Tree Hill." It's villian/mischeaver is Dan Scott. He schems, plots, and waits for the right moment to strike. Unlike JR, he cares little about family or any company. He's only interested in himself. Instead of just lying, back stabing, and manipulating his brother at any chance, Dan kills his own brother in cold blood.
Which of the two actually makes a better villian that you can appreciate more? Both seem to have a nack for wanting to have there own way. I still perfer villians who have a little style or class myself.
Never having watched "One Tree Hill" i wo uld have to say JR Ewing. The schemes he pulled off were legendary for his time.
But personally, I like Darth Vader as a villian, he schemes on a much grander scale.
|
|
|
|
