Enki -> IRC Discussion Channel (8/28/2004 12:11:41 AM)
|
After spending some time in the #lobby it becomes clear that it's not a perfect medium for serious discussion of BDSM topics. A lot of really good conversation is had, but it's very much akin to trying to have a board meeting at a nightclub. Lots of din and scroll. Have there been any experiments in the past with a set discussion channel on the IRC server? If so I'm wasting my time writing this, but if not maybe something can be derived from what I'm about to outline. This idea is still gestating so I'll elaborate my thought process. Pros -Allows for conversation without scroll caused by chit-chat -Discussion topics can be brought up and agreed on with more expedient consensus (or perhaps moderated) -Logs could provide fuel for consideration and discussion on the forums Cons -Niche channels are highly succeptible to becoming empty if not constantly populated -Discussion had in a seperate channel won't be seen by those in the #lobby, and very few newbies get past that room, preventing them from seeing where the more intense discussion is going on (sometimes simply because they don't know how to change channels in IRC) -Biased moderation could lead to a poor perception of the channel Looking at that list, it becomes apparent that without some manner of event scheduling, a channel of that kind relies entirely on constant discussion and activity to remain alive. Perhaps a set discussion channel is only feasible as a set place for scheduled topics. Then again, perhaps our community has the constant level of activity required to keep discussion flowing 24/7. The more readily apparent dynamic is to reserve a room aside such as #discussion, which could function during most hours as an ad-hoc conversation point, and at set hours be a forum for moderated discussion on a pre-set and announced topic. This model is quite normal, the best examples I can think of are the IRC channels used by computer software or games in beta testing. A constant low hum of conversation is typical in those, punctuated by peaks of activity during scheduled chats where the program developers make an appearance to speak and answer questions. I think that's a workable model, and I'm curious to hear what others think, especially those moderators and staff of CollarMe.
|
|
|
|