cloudboy
Posts: 514
Joined: 12/14/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: AAkasha Now, let's take a look at my more down to earth ad, the one that was not a joke, which got very little response: I'm a 30 year old female dominant living south of Los Angeles. I am NOT looking for a boyfriend, lover, husband, or new best friend. I am looking for a casual play partner, no strings attached type situation. If you are single (no wife, no girlfriend) and between the ages of 18 and 32, drop me a line. Novices are fine. The nature of the play I am looking for in this case is mostly bondage and role-playing. Please don't write to me if you are looking for service-oriented scenes, sexual domination, hardcore pain (some light pain can be expected), foot worship, forced feminization or the like. I'm looking for a pretty specific kind of interaction. The games I'm interested in playing are power-types, more on the sensual side than blatantly sexual, more suggestive rather than erotic. Good things for beginners. Please do not have agendas -- the type I am looking for is after one thing primarily -- the sensations/emotions involved with being helpless for a woman and knowing it pleases her. The less focused you are on a style of domination or specific act, the better. I prefer artistic types, shy is ok. You don't need to be god's gift to women, but be self confident and have good qualities that you are proud of. If you are a bit on the thin, femme side, even better. My tastes don't usually run toward perfect bodies, gym types, jocks, military, or super-short hair, but I won't rule it out totally. Good hygiene, social skills and self-awareness are very important to me. You also need to be local -- i.e., within 90 minutes or so, and able to get together with relatively short notice. No money involved and no sex either. If this interests you, drop me a line. A photo would also be great. As a courtesy to those that do fit the specifications outlined, please do not contact me if you are not what I outlined above (i.e., "I'm married, 42 and live in New York, but will be traveling to LA for a conference and would like to be dressed up as a maid and forced to clean your bathroom"). Regards, Akasha Well a few things strike me right off: 1. You have an age range here 18-32, so that eliminates everyone 32-50. 2. Next you want someone single. That eliminates everyone who is attached in some way. 3. No sex. That is not a turn on, that is a turn off. 4. No strings attached. Here you indicate the relationship has no future. That is a turn off in some respects. Also, no strings attached would work best with married men, but they're excluded from the equation, and it works least with single men, who are your target group. 5. Next you want an "artistic" type, which narrows your field even further. 6. The fact that you are not a pro, is a plus. ------ Your other profile has no limits or restrictions and is not expressly "no strings attached" or "no sex." To me, the profiles actually make no difference to me one way or the other unless they indicate: "I'm a pro," --- then I'm not interested. "No married / age range / need specific type" -- then I may be excluded. Otherwise, if I am looking, I will write to either one and see what sort of dialogue happens and if we share any compatibilities or interests. The profile might dictate what type of first letter I write, but no matter what, all I would be trying to do is establish a dialogue back and forth in the beginning. Many domme's, in my experience, or actually most Dommes, don't want a dialogue. I'm not sure what the they want, maybe its a "direct fit." It is my view of life that people do not know “what they want,” and those that feel they do are limiting themselves. To me, meeting people should be an adventure, a curious trek, a learning experince, a discovery – about oneself and the other person. It should not be a market transaction of aligned ages, wants, needs, income levels, and the rest. I like what ProtagonistLily said, about meeting her DOM, that she hated his profile, wasn’t interested in him at all after meeting, but somehow he grew on her. For her, finding her other was sort of organic and chanceful. It was a not planning, targeting, and step by step action toward a defined relationship objective. http://www.collarchat.com/m_230009/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#230730 See also: http://www.collarchat.com/m_199043/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#199043 Her experience resonated with me, and its why I think profiles are somewhat worthless beyond being an introductory primer. This puts me squarely in opposition to Padriag, who recently posted on the importance of profiles. http://www.collarchat.com/m_249788/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#249788
|