inyouagain
Posts: 427
Joined: 1/6/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: iwillserveu I don't know if this is a real thing or what trolls say. I've heard female slaves/subs want a Dom/Master "to protect them." Maybe I'm missing something, but protect them from what exactly. Like I said, this might come from people who claim to be a Dom or bad fiction and may cause much laughter. IMHO the original question was asking what "to protect them" means (with regard from Master/Dom to female sub/slave, and vice-versa)... and the 'aspect/perspective' was also hinted at simply being a 'smoke screen'... a Troll line, and not a valid issue. The first reply was my own, in which I outlined many things which "to protect them" means from a Dom point of view, which entails a female sub/slave's points of view and any limits negotiated. I also stated that especially regarding the diversity of what "to protect them" means, that I did not feel it was gender specific (ie. only applicable only to female sub/slaves). Much hoopla and shenannigans later, I find myself under much spastic ridicule by the obviously highly opinionated and disrepectful thread starter. Every comment I've made has been backed up by comments from others, including Mistresses who acknowledge, with regard to male sub/slaves, "they protect them". For some reason, this seems to be an "extremely hard pill to swallow" for the thread starter, who insists vehemently it simply cannot be... as he himself has not personally experienced, witnessed, or ever seen "protect" written in any Mistress/Domme's Personal Ad he has read since reading newspapers, before the internet. Below I will paste in a section of a Mistress/slave typical contract, specifically regarding the highly dreaded issue of "to protect slave": quote:
4.0.0 Permanent Bodily Harm Since the body of the slave now belongs to the Mistress, it is the Mistress's responsibility to protect that body from permanent bodily harm. Should the slave ever come to permanent bodily harm during the course of punishment,or in any other slavery related activity, whether by intention or accident, it will be grounds for immediate termination of this contract, should the slave so desire. Permanent bodily harm shall be determined as: * a) Death * b) Any damage that involves loss of mobility or function, including broken bones. * c) Any permanent marks on the skin, including scars, burns, or tattoos, (unless accepted by the slave). * d) Any loss of hair, (unless accepted by the slave). * e) Any piercing of the flesh which leaves a permanent hole, (unless accepted by the slave). * f) Any diseases that could result in any of the above results, including sexually transmitted diseases. This contract is located at www.palace.com and may be fully viewed. Note "protection" is also found in various other sections of said contract, and especially section 3.0.1 Rules of Punishment, regarding "protection" from intentional abuse during punishment. Why "protection" is all so 'foreign and inconsistent' to the thread starter, is totally beyond me, and continues same... The displayed "it's my game and I always win" attitude has proven to be a major detriment to information exchange in this thread... and obviously any form of enlightenment regarding the original question and jist of this thread starter. son, this only leaves us with what I've said all along... Wake Up! There is a whole lifestyle happening OUTSIDE your head... 'think out of the box', and quit being a 'jack in the box'... it's really pitiful. Inyouagain
|