LadyElizabeth
Posts: 53
Joined: 11/28/2004 Status: offline
|
First of all, let me start by saying I feel for you MasterGreywolfe. I am in a situation very much like yours. Although, I'm not sure if it is totally alike. I seek both a Domme to submit to, so that I may learn from beneath and a fem slave to practice on. I'm married to my male slave, but he has no say in what goes on in my dungeon, nor my bedroom. I am a firm believer in female supremacy so he would never be alpha over my fem slave. If I were to find one. She would always be dominant over him. This deffinetly complicates the issue of seeking a "third". Not many seem to understand our wish to join such a dynamic. I truely hate to highjack some ones thread but, I feel I must say something. This lifestyle, in its purest form is as open and accepting as one could possibly dream. In it I have found myself and accepted the two spirits within me, that make up who I am. The free flow of ideas and thoughts from a varied and intellegent group of people have helped me gain this perspective. So it is with a pounding heart and fear in my throat that I say this, but only in deffense of others(as if the needed my help, but say this I must). Jacques1000, if you removed the big words and fancy speach from your posts, the content would be no more enlightening then that submitted by a blithering idiot. Your pen spews venom as if no other may have a free thought that may not coincide with yours. Not everyone can put forth the exact thought that traverses the distance between there vast mind and the tip of their fingers. Sometimes there is something lost in the passion one might put forth in r/l, when translated to an online forum. This is not ment as a flame but an observation. I mean no offence, but your tone rubs my fur the wrong way. Not to mention as educated as you seem to be, your grammer and spelling come across a little lacking. Before you cast stones, look hard at yourself. If you are free of fault, move forward in your disclosure of other persons faults. If not. Keep that in mind as you take tone with those you dissagree with. quote:
ORIGINAL: Jacques1000 well, that would seem a little counter-intuitive if not anti-thetical given you have no ability to influence my thoughts on any subject, much less your own subjectivity, and your opinion of me is of no importance to me. Wildfleurs, I think one of the reasons for the 'epidemic' you speak of is that polyamorousness has become the new lesbian chic, and the faux bisexualitié. My point is that there has been a tremendous upsurge into popular culture, particularly in major metropolitan cities. Of course, the French and their menagé a trois and menage de chateau have been doing this for centuries. Interestingly enough, it is now a normalised cultural trope and is not subject to the level of prurient tittery that comes, in say, the US. They are a number of reasons for this, but I think postmodernity and the proposition of a multiplicity of selves (rather than a differentiated unified whole) is idea that has a certain amount of caché. One would only need Brad, Angelina and another to get entwined and it would carry even more gravitas. I know some of my anthro friends are very interested in it, as most of them have been studying Polynesian and Melanesian peoples where polyamorousness and "alternative lifestyle arrangements" have been the norm. (The Tahitian Mahu for example, and the Samoan Fa'afa'fine). I also think that the jaded middle classes want a bit of pep in their relationship and a lot mistakenly think this is the answer.
_____________________________
Judge not lest ye be judged. I do have a profile, for some reason you have to actually search my name from cm's main page. I have no idea why, that's just the way it is. lol.
|