RE: A new theory on people not responding to emails

RE: A new theory on people not responding to emails (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

orfunboi -> RE: A new theory on people not responding to emails (10/26/2005 7:33:34 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: realsumissive Thanks, but I don't need the hint. I'm really not interested in any domme that uses a deleted profile, even if it is on the message boards. There seems to be many threads on these sites about deceiving people. I wonder if dommes using a profile that can't be seen can be catagorized as deceptive? Not sure if they can or not, but seeing that her profile can be seen, it's kinda a mute point huh.

Phoenxx -> RE: A new theory on people not responding to emails (10/26/2005 8:22:44 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Leonidas I have an alternative theory (well, two really). The first theory is that Collarme is a front for the CIA. They put up hundreds of lascivious profiles with sexy pictures because they think that perverts are actually aliens that escaped from Area 51, and they want to keep track of them. The reason that mail never gets replied to is because they don't actually read it, they just run it through a cryptologic machine to see if it contains any secret alien codes. You have my vote for this one...

Padriag -> RE: A new theory on people not responding to emails (10/26/2005 9:18:05 AM)
Pinky... are you pondering what I'm pondering? I think so Brain, but where are we going to get rubber stamps in mandarin this time of night? [:D]

Kasia -> RE: Re: A new theory on people not responding to emails (10/26/2005 11:35:27 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: addcted2it Yes, burying a link in a tag line or in any part of one's text is a clever way of defeating software designed to limit the responder from going to another link. (Note: Web hosts often do not allow people to "advertise" themselves and redirect readers to another Website or E-mail address. However, some Webhosts will actually read submitted profiles, so it really depends upon how sharp they are in finding these hidden messages.) There are may be criptic messages hidden deep within a profile if one simply stops long-enough to analyze it's content. -Phil Huh? Would you care to explain a bit those words I bolded in quoting you? Since it was my profile that mattered, I would really like to know more about "hidden cryptic messages" and "software defeating" in it.

Tawilla -> RE: A new theory on people not responding to emails (10/26/2005 1:38:22 PM)
I am very late coming into this discussion, but I do have another thought on why femdom's don't answer some emails they get. Those writing to the femdom haven't even bothered to read the profile to see what it is she is seeking to see IF they are even a good match. In my profile, I think I stated succinctly what I was looking for, yet I received dozens of replies that didn't even come CLOSE. I would write very polite "Thank you for your interest, but I am only looking for x at the moment. Good luck on your search". When I got the same man writing me his carbon copy introduction letter for the third time, I lost the patience I had. Instead, I changed my profile and it has helped a bit. I just am afraid it now comes off a tad rude, lol. My point is, some of the emails you get are SO far outta the ballpark, you wonder why they wrote you in the first place. Tawilla

Guildenstern -> RE: A new theory on people not responding to emails (10/26/2005 1:48:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: xanderzzz I think your theory holds a lot of water. I cannot speak for Femdom but I know that there are a lot of profiles written just to get some attention and titulation and when someone sincere answers they can't deal with it. My theory (maledom) is more based on an interviewer who has a 1000 resumes for one job. Men on these sites so out number the woman that when the woman sort through their messages it is such a negative event that the first non perfect thing in your message means automatic delete no matter how sincere or real you are. In my opinion woman on these sites would stand a much better chance if they browsed for profiles and sent initial messages to profiles they like than trying to keep an open mind when reading incoming messages. I am always stunned when I correspond with women and they have barely search the profiles and never sent an intial message. I second that opinion! Although to be fair, after a discussion with ES, Rain et all, I made some changes to my profile and that very day I had two subs contact me... Dont know if my ego could stand that on a regular basis without imploding.... still I would like to give that a shot.. [:D]

Guildenstern -> RE: A new theory on people not responding to emails (10/26/2005 1:59:06 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: caitlyn No worries ... I get myself in trouble all the time on here. Can't really figure out why but I'm thinking: a) People are too sensitive ... b) I post while doing my pre-date drinking ... c) both a) & b) ... d) I'm just generally a fuck-up. [;)] See, that is why I wait until the next day post date drinking... makes for a much less clear statement, so people cant tell if I am a fuck up or not... Incognoscibility can be a good thing... although that may be the booze talking :))

candystripper -> RE: A new theory on people not responding to emails (11/4/2005 5:20:51 PM)
deleted by candystripper

candystripper -> RE: A new theory on people not responding to emails (11/4/2005 5:22:36 PM)
deleted by candystripper

candystripper -> RE: A new theory on people not responding to emails (11/4/2005 5:27:30 PM)
quote: No worries ... I get myself in trouble all the time on here. Can't really figure out why but I'm thinking: a) People are too sensitive ... b) I post while doing my pre-date drinking ... c) both a) & b) ... d) I'm just generally a fuck-up. caitlyn miss, you are one of my favorite voices here..hardly a f**k up. candystripper

candystripper -> RE: A new theory on people not responding to emails (11/4/2005 5:30:16 PM)
quote: inlegible PatentLeatherMdm What is inlegible? candystripper (another dim submissive.)

candystripper -> RE: A new theory on people not responding to emails (11/4/2005 5:37:12 PM)
quote: Pinky... are you pondering what I'm pondering? Padraig Probably not Sir..i am in a "mood" atm...take my meaning? (You get three guesses.) candystripper

candystripper -> RE: Re: A new theory on people not responding to emails (11/4/2005 5:41:03 PM)
quote: Huh? Would you care to explain a bit those words I bolded in quoting you? Since it was my profile that mattered, I would really like to know more about "hidden cryptic messages" and "software defeating" in it. Kasia OMG; the woman's a secret member of the Mossat. This explains everything. candystripper

Page: << < prev 1 2 3 [4]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Collarchat.com is a member of the Free Speech Coalition

Terms of Service

4.199219E-02