EmeraldSlave2
Posts: 3610
Joined: 1/1/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: SIRSTAFFS I was just wondering if a switch is necessary for a poly relationship, especially if it is live-in. No. In fact the most common poly relationship you hear about in bdsm relationships is one dom/multi slave/no switch configuration. quote:
where the switch could be mistress to the sub. Neither of them would need to work in the vanilla world, so they may be together for prolonged periods. That works for me. However, just because they don't have a vanilla job doesn't mean they will be together for prolonger periods, there's still work to be done, families to attend to, etc. quote:
*jealousy on the subs part if the switch enters the relationship later on That's no different than any concern in a poly relationship, no matter what configuration. quote:
*the switch getting too free a reign to become the subs mistress while i am away A reasonable concern, but I don't think the issue is too free a reign, but lack of taking responsibility for the reign and submission they have taken upon themselves. quote:
*domination from a distance can be tricky with bratty/feisty types Well you can either not get into relationships with brats (which is what I do) or train them better. Switch does not equal brat, nor does it equal power struggler. quote:
Is this predicament just pertinent to my situation or could a hierarchy aid a poly relationship? Depends on the people. Your issues are more related to training and communication, not anything inherent in switches or heirarchies. quote:
Would having two-subs when true 24/7 can be obtained be better? Better than what? Better in what way? Are you saying you are having to make a choice between "true 24/7" and "having two subs"?
|