SenorX
Posts: 142
Joined: 12/23/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: rufus1969 It is still a bit early for us to combine assets and debts. We already do combine income and expenses, but we wanted some more time together before taking the next step. We have discussed it though. At a future date and time, we will quite likely combine 90% of all resources, both to help protect us as well as provide for the children regardless of who their biological parents are--all of the adults are committed to all of the children. As a law student, I have and continue to read on solutions. So far, the Family Limited Partnership would be the ideal vehicle for us. Actually, with all of the political debates surrounding marriage, I have be curious why gay couples haven't turned to the Family Limited Partnership as a solution. Excellent post, rufus! I can tell you have been doing some serious research in re this topic for yourselves. Here are some of My comments though, infra, that may or may not shed some additional light: You may wish to check on a sub chapter L. The FLP's (Family Limited Partnerships) were quite fashionable in the latter 90's until the IRS made some changes whereby some of the tax benefits decimated. The corporation idea is still an excellent idea, but you may wish to check out some of the alternatives in establishing a corp for the family. In re the comment concerning gay couples, the major influence behind their desires to be able to marry (or at least be officially recognized as a legal spousal entity is in order for the corporate benefits to extend to the 'dependent' since most benefits only extend to dependents under 18, 23 if in college, or with a physical or mental disability which would prevent them from living independently). There are various options available to those who have not formed a legal entity, namely a corp of some sort. One is to place the second or additional subs into a domestic category in re taxes, thereby allowing to claim deductions for allowances, etc. to a degree. Another is to start a small, home-based business of your own, pool that income together, take Schedule C deductions, etc. as merely a Schedule C filer. In so doing, you can take out franchise group health coverages (small group plans) under one name, open an account under the business name, start up some form of savings or retirement planning, and take out what would be known as 'key-man' insurance. The problem found herein is that when any kind of business sort of entity begins to offer benefits, then ERISA regs may become an element to consider, and it is imperative that accurate accounting and bookkeeping records be kept in case of any potential problems arising in the future. If anybody reading this wishes to seriously figure out some beneficial avenues for financial planning, without the pressure of having to buy stocks, annuities, mutual funds, insurance, or other programs, feel free to contact Me. I have a consulting group whereby I and a few associates can help people formulate the best strategies for that individual purpose and do so legally without bucking or sneaking around the system, but rather using the established systems to their best benefits. Best Regards, X
|