topcat
Posts: 1013
Joined: 1/31/2004 From: Long Island Status: offline
|
Iwill- While I must admit that Objectivism is actually not more flawed that any other philosophy I have studied, It annoys me more than most because it gives one an excuse for being a self-absorbed jackass. I once was a writer for an objectivist literary jounal ("Fragments", now defunct) and I was basiclly the 'loyal opposition' to the Rand Band I had fallen in with. Oddly, I found them to be, without exception, some of the most other-foucused, compasionate, and warm people I have known, which made them very poor objectivists, IMO. Rands writing was, IMO, exceed only by Poe's prose for lead pipe heaviness in making a point, and making it , and making it, and making it. Then, just in case you missed it, Her perfect specimen would stop the book to deliver a one hundred and twenty five or so page monologue explaining the underlying philiosophy. As I have a compulsion to finish anything I start reading, I would finish her books while screaming in pain, with blood running from my eyes. Rand _DID_ write some great quotable bits, and some of her scene setting was simply brillant, but on a whole, she is best suited to inclusion as a specimen to illustrate what happens when you encourage a loony too much. Stay warm, Lawrence
_____________________________
-there is no remission without blood-
|